“The last thing we ever wanted to do…” — Police reveal the contents of SECOND LETTER found in the tɾɑgic Mosman Park case involving a family of four, lɑying bɑre the parents’ deeply heartbreaking plan in full

The tragic events in Mosman Park, a affluent suburb of Perth, Western Australia, have shocked the local community and sparked widespread discussion about mental health, disability support, and family caregiving burdens. On January 30, 2026, the bodies of a family of four—parents Jarrod Clune, 50, and Maiwenna Goasdoue (also reported as Mai), 49, along with their teenage sons Leon, 16, and Otis, 14—were discovered inside their home on Mott Close. Three family pets (two dogs and a cat) were also found deceased. Western Australia Police quickly classified the incident as a suspected double murder-suicide, describing it as a “devastating tragedy.”

The discovery began when a caregiver, scheduled to attend to the boys, arrived at the property that morning and noticed a note attached to the front door. The note reportedly contained instructions along the lines of “don’t enter” and “call police.” Concerned, the caregiver alerted emergency services, leading police to enter the home around 8:15 a.m. and find the family members in different parts of the property. No weapons were reported in initial statements, and the exact cause of death has not been publicly detailed pending further investigation by the Homicide Squad.

Both teenage boys were said to have experienced “significant health challenges,” with reports indicating they were on the autism spectrum and received support services, including through Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). Some accounts from carers and community members have suggested the family may have felt overwhelmed by the demands of long-term caregiving, though no official motive has been confirmed by police.

A key development emerged over the following days: the discovery of a second note inside the home. While the first note served as a warning to outsiders, this additional letter—described in media reports as more detailed and structured—provided greater insight into the parents’ mindset and preparations. According to sources cited in outlets like WA Today, PerthNow, and news.com.au, the second note indicated a level of premeditation and joint decision-making between the parents. It included instructions on financial arrangements post-death, such as how assets or funds should be handled, suggesting the act was carefully considered rather than impulsive.

Sensationalized social media posts and some online articles have circulated alleged quotes from the letter, such as variations like “The last thing we ever wanted to do…” or “We had prepared for this day, but…,” framing them as heartbreaking admissions of reluctance amid an unbearable situation. These phrases appear in viral Facebook posts and clickbait-style headlines, often emphasizing the emotional weight and implying the parents viewed their actions as a tragic but necessary escape from caregiving pressures. However, mainstream Australian media (including ABC News, The Sydney Morning Herald, and 9News) have been more restrained, noting that police have declined to publicly disclose the full contents of the note, as it forms part of an ongoing investigation. Authorities have emphasized that the letter helped confirm the murder-suicide classification due to evidence of planning and shared intent, but specifics remain withheld to respect the investigation and the family’s privacy.

The tragedy has prompted reflection on systemic issues. Former carers and disability advocates have voiced concerns that the family may have been “failed” by inadequate NDIS support, highlighting the immense strain on parents raising children with complex needs like severe autism. Community leaders, including local MP Kate Chaney, expressed profound sorrow, acknowledging the lasting impact on neighbors, friends, schools, and first responders. School newsletters reportedly painted a picture of the boys’ earlier lives filled with typical childhood moments, contrasting sharply with the family’s final chapter.

This case underscores broader challenges in supporting families with disabilities. In Australia, the NDIS aims to provide funding for therapies, equipment, and respite care, but critics argue wait times, bureaucratic hurdles, and gaps in mental health integration can leave caregivers isolated. While it’s premature to attribute the tragedy solely to these factors—police investigations continue, and mental health complexities likely played a role—the incident has renewed calls for better resources, early intervention, and community awareness.

As the investigation progresses, authorities urge compassion and caution against speculation. The loss of four lives, including two young people who relied on their parents for everything, serves as a somber reminder of the hidden struggles behind closed doors. Support services remain available for those affected by similar pressures, including Lifeline (13 11 14 in Australia) and NDIS-related counseling.

In the wake of such profound grief, the community in Mosman Park and beyond grapples with unanswerable questions: What signs were missed? How can society better shield families from reaching such despair? The second letter, whatever its exact words, lays bare a plan born of apparent desperation—one that no family should ever feel compelled to enact.